The judiciary system is the backbone of the legal system of a country. It ensures that justice is served and the rule of law is upheld. A competent judiciary is crucial to maintaining peace and harmony in society. However, not all competencies are the same in the judiciary system. There are two types of competencies that differentiate the effectiveness of a judiciary system – absolute and relative competencies.
Competency Showdown: Absolute vs. Relative in Judiciary
Absolute competency refers to the ability of a judiciary system to perform its duties without being influenced by any external factors. It means that the judiciary system can act according to the law and its own principles without any interference from the executive or legislative branches of government. An absolute competency judiciary system maintains its independence and impartiality, which is essential for fair and just decisions.
On the other hand, relative competency is the ability of a judiciary system to perform its duties in comparison to other judiciary systems. It means that a judiciary system is considered competent if it is better than other judiciary systems in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, and reliability. A relative competency judiciary system is one that sets the benchmark for other judiciary systems and continuously improves to maintain its position as the best.
Know the Difference: A Cheerful Guide to Judiciary’s Competencies
It is essential to understand the difference between absolute and relative competencies of a judiciary system. An absolute competency judiciary system ensures that justice is served without any interference, making it a fair and just system. On the other hand, a relative competency judiciary system always strives to improve and set the benchmark for other judiciary systems, making it an efficient and reliable system.
In conclusion, the difference between absolute and relative competencies in a judiciary system is significant. An absolute competency judiciary system maintains its independence and impartiality, whereas a relative competency judiciary system continuously improves to maintain its position as the best. Both types of competencies are essential to ensure that justice is served and the rule of law is upheld in a society.