Seven Important Elements That May Affect Your Roundup Claim

The Monsanto Company first made Roundup available to the public in 1974. It contains glyphosate, the key component of a number of commercial herbicides made for all-purpose weed management. Additionally, Monsanto created genetically modified crops, including cotton and soybeans, that are glyphosate-resistant or Roundup-ready. 

Unfortunately, some farmers utilized larger doses of glyphosate to eradicate superweeds on their farms. This method requires significantly less work than weeding the land by hand and plowing. However, glyphosate can harm the environment and human health in higher amounts. 

What Elements Affect a Roundup Lawsuit?

When submitting a claim, time is of the essence. It is crucial to confirm your eligibility for your claim as soon as possible. Read on to find the best lawyer for roundup lawsuit.

Here are some elements that may play a role in your situation:

  • Evidence That Monsanto Failed to Issue a Health Risk Warning

In the past, the corporation has been accused of negligence, deceptive advertising, and failing to warn customers about the potential risks of glyphosate exposure. In the past, litigants have claimed that Monsanto misconstrued or disregarded safety information during the herbicide’s production, distribution, and sale.

  • Evidence of Product Design Negligence

The plaintiff would have to show that Monsanto was negligent in the product design and that this negligence caused the plaintiff harm in addition to the company’s failure to warn consumers. 

  • Verification of Roundup (Glyphosate) Use

Obtain proof that you came into contact with Roundup at work, on the farm, or at home. These could be old bottles, purchase documents, standard operating procedures (if you were exposed at work), or invoices for landscaping. 

  • Exposure Level and Time

You might have a stronger case if you were exposed to the herbicide over a long period of time and continuously.

  • How long did it take between exposure and diagnosis?

The court may consider the time between your exposure and the date of your diagnosis as the latency period. Typically, lymphoma linked to high-dose pesticide exposure takes at least two years to manifest. Therefore, you must be sure that the period of time between your exposure and diagnosis falls inside this heading. 

  • Evidence Connecting the Exposure to Your Diagnosis

The Roundup exposure that caused your sickness should be supported by scientific evidence. This is the most crucial piece of evidence you can acquire to get the judge to rule in your favor. 

  • Additional Health Conditions

Your situation may be considerably impacted by additional medical conditions known as comorbidities that increase your risk of developing cancer or another sickness. For instance, if you smoke cigarettes or have HIV/AIDS, your chances of receiving financial compensation may be reduced. 

Recent Post